As reported by Fanhouse, ESPN is considering abandoning the vintage sports format and turning ESPN Classic into “ESPN3″ - using English Premier League programming as a cornerstone. Late in 1997, ESPN acquired the Classic Sports Network for a reported $175 million, slapped the ESPN name on it and integrated the channel into the Disney family. This enabled Classic to overcome a crucial disadvantage - lack of distribution. Currently, the channel is in about 62 million homes - on par with ESPN News.
However, no one is watching this channel. Looking at Total Day coverage area Male 18-49 ratings for 2Q to date (through 5/11), ESPN Classic ranks 59th out of 68 ad-supported channels measured daily by Nielsen.
Not only is Classic ranked behind all other targeted sports networks, but it also trails the female-targeted WE channel….IN Men 18-49.
| MEN 18-49 | ||||
| RANK | NET | RTG | YoY % CHG | |
| 1 | ESPN | .73 | +16% | |
| 15 | ESPN2 | .22 | +10% | |
| 27 | VS | .14 | +56% | |
| 27 | SPD | .14 | +17% | |
| 39 | NFLN | .09 | n.c. | |
| 45 | ENN | .08 | -11% | |
| 45 | G4 | .08 | +14% | |
| 45 | MIL | .08 | +14% | |
| 45 | ID | .08 | n.c. | |
| 45 | TV1 | .08 | -20% | |
| 57 | WE | .05 | +25% | |
| 57 | GOLF | .05 | -17% | |
| 59 | DHLT | .04 | n.c. | |
| 59 | TVGN | .04 | -20% | |
| 59 | BBCA | .04 | +100% | |
| 59 | NKTNS | .04 | n.c. | |
| 59 | ESPCL | .04 | -20% | |
| 64 | SOAP | .03 | -25% | |
| 64 | STYL | .03 | +50% | |
| 64 | VH1C | .03 | n.c. | |
| 67 | FUSE | .02 | n.c. | |
| 67 | THEN | .02 | -60% | |
In terms of average audience, Classic has just 43,000 viewers - ahead of only VH1 Classic and Fuse.
Bottom line - this format is just not a big enough draw. Now that Classic is not producing any original content (Cheap Seats, Ringside) around the branding, it’s clearly poised for a change. Given the amount of content ESPN has rights to, there is more than enough programming to populate an ESPN3 schedule that would yield a larger audience than Classic.
However, positioning the channel around soccer is a risky proposition. It’s likely that MSOs would treat this as a specialty channel and push to relegate it to the lesser-distributed sports tiers. Depending on their current agreements, though, ESPN could have some time to demonstrate that this relaunched channel would cast a wider net. Time will tell.
Entries (RSS)